Vera Haller’s first professional training was as a teacher of classical ballet in Austria. At the beginning of the 30s her research into the body’s gracefulness and expressivity led her to take two drawing courses at the Kunstgewerbeschule in Vienna, specifically on the representation of movement, under the guidance of Margarethe Hammerschlag (1894-1944 Auschwitz).
She began painting once she had arrived in Switzerland just after her first marriage at the outbreak of World War Two. Haller came to painting relatively late and her first known oil paintings are from 1945 when the artist was 35.
She studied at the Kleine Akademie in Zurich under Henry Wabel (Zurich 1889-1981) and took several advanced courses at the Académie de la Grande Chaumière in Paris between 1951 and 1955, studying with Edouard Mac-Avoy (1905-1991).
As a painter I’m attracted above all to figurative art. I’m an expressionist and lean towards abstraction through progressive simplification.
In the context of a waning late-cubist style, influenced by her Zurich teacher, the quotation draws attention to the fact that Vera Haller already showed a fine technical mastery of painting, marked by very secure formal construction and an essence which seems to predict her later change of direction towards the abstract.
In 1953 in New York she held her first solo exhibition at the Galerie Moderne.
Through her meeting James Fitzsimmons, who turned out to be the main facilitator of new cultural opportunities, her works slowly lost their plasticity, solidity and their initial substance; they also gradually became less figurative.
This path took her through an initial conformity to gestural-tachisme and led, from 1956, to radical grappling with the primary means of expression in painting: strokes, colour and the two-dimensional nature of a composition on a canvas.
In 1957 the artist adopted her own variation of the informal style.
It turned out that the gestural aspects were a throwback to the earlier figurative painting. A fresh freedom and urgency of pictorial gesture, not haphazard, seemed to recall the drawings of motion with which she contended a quarter of a century earlier during her ballet training.
The effect of conforming to the informal style in the European mould and to American abstract expressionism brought about a certain detachment from the avant-garde experience and is therefore considered the fruit of a natural and well thought-through evolution of her own artistic discourse. This was always characterized by a deep connection with pictorial tradition both of the past, if one consideres the use of bronze gilt, and of her interest in non-European cultures, from whom she extracted formal archetypal motifs.
Gradually, from 1960 onwards, her painting abandoned strokes to re-evaluate shape, a subject which evolved through dominant and insistent archaic motifs, characterized by the vertical and horizontal contrasts of a cross, painted thickly so that the colour came alive, almost organic.
Here the artist reached the zenith of her informal expressive intensity, where the interior conflict between instinct and rationality took place on the most emotional level.
Her later circles series, from between 1962-64 began to submit to the gradual lessening of this conflict, a lessening which showed itself both in the shape of the painted surface with corners eliminated, offering continuity with the wall spatially, as well as embuing the picture with symbolic value.